> We consistently found that not enumerating an exact list or instructions in the prompt produced better results Not sure if he means training here or using hi

> We consistently found that not enumerating an exact list or instructions in the prompt produced better results Not sure if he means training here or using his product. I think the latter. My end-user exp of GPT3.5 is that I need to be - not just precise but the exact flavor of precise. It's usually after some trial and error. Then more error. Then more trial. Getting a useful result on the 1st or 3rd try happens maybe 1 in 10 sessions. A bit more common is having 3.5 include what I clearly asked it not to. It often complies eventually.