3 ms·
If someone were to create something new, a blank slate approach, what would you find valuable and why?
by sroussey 3y ago
If someone were to create something new, a blank slate approach, what would you find valuable and why?
- lordofmoria 3y agoThis is a great question! I think we now know, collectively, a lot more about what’s annoying/hard about building LLM features than we did when LangChain was being furiously developed. And some things we thought would be important and not-easy, turned out to be very easy: like getting GPT to give back well-formed JSON. So I think there’s lots of room. One thing LangChain is doing now that solves something that IS very hard/annoying is testing. I spent 30 minutes yesterday re-running a slow prompt because 1 in 5 runs would produce weird output. Each tweak to the prompt, I had to run at least 10 times to be reasonably sure it was an improvement.
- codewithcheese 3y agoIt can be faster and more effective to fallback to a smaller model (gpt3.5 or haiku), the weakness of the prompt will be more obvious on a smaller model and your iteration time will be faster
- JeremyHerrman 3y agogreat insight!
- sroussey 3y agoHow would testing work out ideally?
- jsemrau 3y agoUse a local model. For most tasks they are good enough. Let's say Mistral 0.2 instruct is quite solid by now.
- gnat 3y agoDo different versions react to prompts in the same way? I imagined the prompt would be tailored to the quirks of a particular version rather than naturally being stably optimal across versions.
- jsemrau 3y agoI suppose that is one of the benefits of using a local model, that it reduces model risk. I.e., given a certain prompt, it should always reply in the same way. Using a hosted model, operationally you don't have that control over model risk.
- cpursley 3y agoWhat are the best local/open models for accurate tool-calling?