4 ms·
The article focuses on latent ability. And goes somewhat into the classification of people who use direction vs. those that use landmarks to navigate. There's
by chiph 2y ago
The article focuses on latent ability. And goes somewhat into the classification of people who use direction vs. those that use landmarks to navigate.
There's a graphic in the article with four maps drawn from memory by different people. They say that #1 is perfect and that #4 is bad. As a programmer, I see them as connected graphs and that both are nearly a match to each other. But #4 has a different orientation and doesn't show curves in the road. But IMO it would still allow you to get to the locations marked if you turned the paper as you moved.
There are also people who have lost their sense of direction due to injury. I had a neighbor who could not go to the supermarket by themselves because of brain damage (from a car accident). They were totally reliant on a family member - or later a GPS unit just to travel as little as 3-4 blocks.
- jprete 2y agoUnfortunately, you've completely missed the point of the four drawings - seeing whether the drawer could identify and use likely routes that they weren't shown. If map #1 is accurate, then I can turn right when I get to the tree and take a shortcut to the brick wall, or cut across from the lamps to the green box without going through the four-road crossroad. Map #4 will be misleading at best for understanding the whole area - if I try a shortcut from that map, I'll either get to the wrong destination or leave the original area and be totally lost.
- jeffbee 2y agoEverything in map #4 is backwards with respect to left/right turns.