3 ms·
What C# has that Kotlin doesn't is the ability to write perfromant code. Sure, if you really care you probably will go for something lower level, but if you do
by Xeamek 3y ago
What C# has that Kotlin doesn't is the ability to write perfromant code.
Sure, if you really care you probably will go for something lower level, but if you don't want to abandon all the nice things that high lvl language offer, C# still exposes some tools to get your hand dirty every now and then.
(Unsafe, stack allocation etc.)
Kotlin meanwhile goes even further then java and completely removes the distinction between stack and heap, slamming every single type into an object.
Painful.
- pjmlp 3y agoDid I mention Kotlin?
- magicalhippo 3y agoYes? > Nowadays busy with Scala and Kotlin. Perhaps not a reference to Kotlin being a good replacement for C#, but you did mention it in a post pushing Java.
- pjmlp 3y agoReferring to what Erik Mejier is doing professionally, after Microsoft. English comprehension skills, on a sentence whose context follows from previous paragraph.