3 ms·
There are painpoints in working with ”modern web stuff”. But: > My counter-argument is that the simplest tool has the largest chance of not breaking over long
by s4i 3y ago
There are painpoints in working with ”modern web stuff”. But:
> My counter-argument is that the simplest tool has the largest chance of not breaking over long periods of time. I have dynamic websites I built 10 years ago that still run almost untouched because I used the simplest stack possible.
My whole argument was that any reasonable frontend stack can work if your requirements stay constant. But let’s say in a startup you definitely don’t know on day one what you’ll need to implement. So it’s understandable why people pick something that’s popular and capable.
- ehnto 3y agoOh for sure, and in a commercial setting your other point about being able to hire people is just as important. Don't get me wrong, React and friends are totally fine tool choices for teams and projects of significant (or loosely defined) scope.