3 ms·

“No comment” doesn’t seem like an incompetent comment. Why do you assign more value to unsubstantive PR speak?

• ethbr1 3y ago
  Because "no comment" is less of a plan than even mindless PR pablum, that a PR agency should have been able to churn out without thinking. Unless Sisense (a) had no prepared PR plan for this scenario and/or (b) has no idea what actually happened, so are still terrified to legally expose themselves by putting any words to paper. E.g. They still haven't put out a press release: https://www.sisense.com/newsroom/ https://www.sisense.com/newsroom/ Aside from, you know, their piece on how properly isolated multi-tenant is a secure architecture pattern: https://www.sisense.com/blog/benefits-of-next-generation-multi-tenancy-to-embedded-analytics/ https://www.sisense.com/blog/benefits-of-next-generation-mul...
  • mulmen 3y ago
    What if their prepared plan was “no comment“? I think you’re making an unreasonable number of assumptions.
    • ethbr1 3y ago
      Do you think "no comment" is a good plan, when you've just sent out an emergency email to all of your customers telling them to rotate any credentials they entrusted to you?
      • deleted 3y ago
        [deleted]
      • mulmen 3y ago
        I think it could be a plan. And I don’t think more words to also say nothing is in any way better.