3 ms·
Sorry if I trigger anyone's paranoia, but 1. who told you that it's not a state-backed attack? 2. and if 1 is true, who told it, it's not Russia staying behind
by levleontiev 3y ago
Sorry if I trigger anyone's paranoia, but
1. who told you that it's not a state-backed attack?
2. and if 1 is true, who told it, it's not Russia staying behind it?
and if 2 is true, the KGB university alumni Kaspersky definitely is related to it.
- thrdbndndn 3y agoAnd it's relevant to the article because?
- fodmap 3y agoI suppose they say that because the article has been written by Kaspersky, and it's hosted on a server under their control?
- thrdbndndn 3y agoEven let's go all the way down and say the backdoor was directly written by Kaspersky themselves, does it change the value of the content (which is purely technical analysis) anyhow?
- fodmap 3y agoI suppose parent comment don't discuss the quality of the article but the theoretical danger of connecting to a server under Kaspersky control. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaspersky_bans_and_allegations_of_Russian_government_ties https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaspersky_bans_and_allegations...