> It seems like a decent amount of the evidence regarding puberty blockers was excluded for dubious reasons. The systematic review commissioned by Cass on the

> It seems like a decent amount of the evidence regarding puberty blockers was excluded for dubious reasons. The systematic review commissioned by Cass on the outcomes of puberty blocking interventions is here: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-326669 https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-326669 The authors' quality assessment of each study is here: https://adc.bmj.com/content/archdischild/early/2024/04/09/archdischild-2023-326669/DC5/embed/inline-supplementary-material-5.pdf https://adc.bmj.com/content/archdischild/early/2024/04/09/ar... Of the 50 studies in that list, which of these do you suspect were excluded for dubious reasons?