3 ms·
No! X--X--X 0 1 2 That diagram represents a length of 2, not a length of 3, see? Here's three: X--X--X--X 0 1 2 3 It's not that the haz
by partdavid 2y ago
No!
X--X--X
0 1 2
That diagram represents a length of 2, not a length of 3, see? Here's three:
X--X--X--X
0 1 2 3
It's not that the hazelnuts are somehow imperfectly laid out or are an imperfect representation. It's wrong in principle, not practice (I mean it's wrong in practice too but every representation is).
- jb1991 2y agoThank you for literally explaining it to me like I was five, which apparently I am, I can’t believe I missed that.
- lupire 2y agoYou didn't miss it. You were focusing on the lattice edges, and PP was focusing on the lattice points. You're both right (except for PP's "No!" which should be "Yes!").