3 ms·
Sure that's true, but a lot of properties in tourist-heavy areas are owned by people who use income from short-term rentals to pay the mortgage. It's one thing
by CrimsonCape 3y ago
Sure that's true, but a lot of properties in tourist-heavy areas are owned by people who use income from short-term rentals to pay the mortgage.
It's one thing if you can look at a property and say, "well my income is high enough that I can afford the note on this property."
It's another thing if you say "well I can afford this property by using the property to pay for itself"
I would argue that a lot of the properties will be sold off.
- hn_throwaway_99 3y ago> I would argue that a lot of the properties will be sold off. Which, if that happens, should lower the average cost of housing for long term residents, which is basically the primary goal of this bill.