3 ms·
> Prior to the election the censorship was more or less 9:1 in favor of Lula. Who also happened to be the favored candidate of the supreme court judges. Oh, ye
by thiagoharry 3y ago
> Prior to the election the censorship was more or less 9:1 in favor of Lula. Who also happened to be the favored candidate of the supreme court judges.
Oh, yeah, most of them, the same judges that voted for keeping Lula jailed, forbade them of being liberated for attending to his brother's funeral... They really are Lula supporters...
But oh, one side of the election 20x more disinformation against ellections and committed much more irregularities, and they suffered 9x more penalties and condemnations... Really a very serious proof of biased judges...
- matheusmoreira 3y agoUh yeah. When after the election you go to public events and brag about the fact that the court defeated Bolsonarism and that if Lula is in the presidency today it's due to the court's decisions, it becomes essentially impossible to claim that you are not biased. I remember one of them even bragged about how he's proud to be partidarian in complete defiance of common sense.