Agree that charging on a link is bad. I'd even argue, that if you are going to charge for linking to an article, then I'd expect no ads on that site. But, anyt

Agree that charging on a link is bad. I'd even argue, that if you are going to charge for linking to an article, then I'd expect no ads on that site. But, anything beyond a link starts to open up questions for me. Who even uses Google's AI summarize feature for articles? For me, most of the time it's been because the pop-up for it jumped in the way for me and it was an accidental click. When I have intentionally used it, it's been a pretty poor summary and misses key nuances that make the article unique compared to other publishers. Taking a step back further, I don't know who is asking for this feature. What's the target market here? Also, perhaps I'm wrong here but I don't think anyone would want an AI summarized version of other types of media like songs or movies.