4 ms·
You do not need "C# Dev Kit", it's nigh useless if you already used plain C# extension, which has the actual good bits you need. Also, Rider is free if you app
by neonsunset 3y ago
You do not need "C# Dev Kit", it's nigh useless if you already used plain C# extension, which has the actual good bits you need.
Also, Rider is free if you apply for an OSS license (if you use it for FOSS), or have your company pay for it if you use it professionally.
- pier25 3y agoWhat's the difference between the C# Dev Kit and the C# extension?
- neonsunset 3y agoThe description is somewhat misleading but it comes down to 1. Visual Studio style solution explorer and 2. Visual Studio style tests explorer [0] While the former may be missed by some, I long ago adapted and prefer to normal folder and file navigation, and for the latter there are other extensions to browser the tests. The ability to run/debug specific tests is already included in the base C# extension, while project management is actually easier via CLI the same way you do it with Rust's cargo (dotnet new {templateName}, dotnet new sln, dotnet sln add/remove, etc.). [0] https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=ms-dotnettools.csdevkit https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=ms-dotne...