3 ms·

What does it say? I think adding the comment that they “changed their mind” was unreasonable because they didn’t change their mind. They wanted an opportunity

by mulmen 3y ago

What does it say? I think adding the comment that they “changed their mind” was unreasonable because they didn’t change their mind. They wanted an opportunity which they got but didn’t exercise. They didn’t say “don’t contact us for comment in the future.” Which would be “changing their mind”. Their comment was simply “no comment”. This seems completely reasonable to me.

ethbr1 3y ago
That they weren't even prepared enough to say "We at Sisense take security very seriously. Highest priority. Industry standards. Etc. Etc."
- mulmen 3y ago
  That seems like a leap. I’m not sure what value can be gained from such an assumption.
  - ethbr1 3y ago
    Incompetence.
    - mulmen 3y ago
      “No comment” doesn’t seem like an incompetent comment. Why do you assign more value to unsubstantive PR speak?
      - ethbr1 3y ago
        Because "no comment" is less of a plan than even mindless PR pablum, that a PR agency should have been able to churn out without thinking. Unless Sisense (a) had no prepared PR plan for this scenario and/or (b) has no idea what actually happened, so are still terrified to legally expose themselves by putting any words to paper. E.g. They still haven't put out a press release: https://www.sisense.com/newsroom/ https://www.sisense.com/newsroom/ Aside from, you know, their piece on how properly isolated multi-tenant is a secure architecture pattern: https://www.sisense.com/blog/benefits-of-next-generation-multi-tenancy-to-embedded-analytics/ https://www.sisense.com/blog/benefits-of-next-generation-mul...
        mulmen 3y ago
        What if their prepared plan was “no comment“? I think you’re making an unreasonable number of assumptions.
        ethbr1 3y ago
        Do you think "no comment" is a good plan, when you've just sent out an emergency email to all of your customers telling them to rotate any credentials they entrusted to you?
        deleted 3y ago
        [deleted]
        mulmen 3y ago
        I think it could be a plan. And I don’t think more words to also say nothing is in any way better.

by mulmen 3y ago

ethbr1 3y ago

That they weren't even prepared enough to say "We at Sisense take security very seriously. Highest priority. Industry standards. Etc. Etc."

mulmen 3y ago
That seems like a leap. I’m not sure what value can be gained from such an assumption.
- ethbr1 3y ago
  Incompetence.
  - mulmen 3y ago
    “No comment” doesn’t seem like an incompetent comment. Why do you assign more value to unsubstantive PR speak?
    - ethbr1 3y ago
      Because "no comment" is less of a plan than even mindless PR pablum, that a PR agency should have been able to churn out without thinking. Unless Sisense (a) had no prepared PR plan for this scenario and/or (b) has no idea what actually happened, so are still terrified to legally expose themselves by putting any words to paper. E.g. They still haven't put out a press release: https://www.sisense.com/newsroom/ https://www.sisense.com/newsroom/ Aside from, you know, their piece on how properly isolated multi-tenant is a secure architecture pattern: https://www.sisense.com/blog/benefits-of-next-generation-multi-tenancy-to-embedded-analytics/ https://www.sisense.com/blog/benefits-of-next-generation-mul...
      - mulmen 3y ago
        What if their prepared plan was “no comment“? I think you’re making an unreasonable number of assumptions.
        ethbr1 3y ago
        Do you think "no comment" is a good plan, when you've just sent out an emergency email to all of your customers telling them to rotate any credentials they entrusted to you?
        deleted 3y ago
        [deleted]
        mulmen 3y ago
        I think it could be a plan. And I don’t think more words to also say nothing is in any way better.