The problem with this post is that instead of taking the articulate arguments of why facebook might become less successful in the future and arguing against the

The problem with this post is that instead of taking the articulate arguments of why facebook might become less successful in the future and arguing against them, it more or less says 'Heres a troll who agrees with you, so you must be wrong'. Later we get 'Heres a list of [fairly random] things about facebook'. So what? These may or may not be relevant to the future of facebook but aren't explained at all in these terms by the author. If you want to write a blog post about something like this, please explore the issues more and don't just fill it with opinion and conjecture.