3 ms·
Maybe I'll be the only one to say it, but this doesn't work with NoScript. Maybe this actually is a JS free Stopwatch, but the site doesn't work without JS ena
by afhof 14y ago
Maybe I'll be the only one to say it, but this doesn't work with NoScript. Maybe this actually is a JS free Stopwatch, but the site doesn't work without JS enabled. Perhaps the title of this should be changed, or relinked to a JS free version?
- antimora 14y agoI tried testing the same way too, and it failed on me. I think the code would not load properly without JavaScript enabled. The proof that it works without JavaScript is the empty box where you put your JavaScript code.
- candeira 14y agoIt uses prefix-free, which is a script, in order to be cleaner-looking code. As the author says: > The JS used is prefixfree - just to make the length and size of the tutorial short and easy. No images or JS are used in the stopwatch logic/display. It would be trivial to make a new -really- JS free version, but it wouldn't be so easy to understand. It could be non-js in production, it just isn't for teaching purposes, so I am happy to accept it as a 'non-js' stopwatch.