3 ms·
It's a wtf because you can't draw any good lines on statistics. Web server admins have legitimate reasons to track (i.e. log) all requests to some extent agai
by einhverfr 14y ago
It's a wtf because you can't draw any good lines on statistics. Web server admins have legitimate reasons to track (i.e. log) all requests to some extent against their web sites. We have good tools to help analyse a lot of this.
Consider a real world equivalent. Suppose you walk into a bookstore and buy a book with cash. The store might not be able to track you individually but they can track how many people visited, how many books they sold, etc. You can't say that's not legitimate.
So I could see an argument that the line that should be drawn is one that involved tracking cookies, but that is quite a narrow exclusion regarding statistics of individual users. You can still get pretty good stuff from the access log and there's no case to be made that DNT means Do Not Log.
- zobzu 14y agoStatistics != "logging" Then again anyone is free to track/not track, stat/not stat (so far at least) and only "not track" subset of their data (as long as they don't lie) Then again there's a few privacy-aware websites who do logging and some stats but on pseudonymized IPs which is also a pretty decent compromise.
- einhverfr 14y agoBut what about mining statistics from logs?