3 ms·
It’s called sex. There’s no way to mass produce it, but it’s not called the art of seduction for nothing. Massage also qualifies in my book.
by futureshock 3y ago
It’s called sex. There’s no way to mass produce it, but it’s not called the art of seduction for nothing. Massage also qualifies in my book.
- havelhovel 3y ago"When questioned about the relationship between art and sexuality, Pablo Picasso once replied, 'It’s the same thing.'" https://time.com/archive/6671960/sex-in-the-city/ https://time.com/archive/6671960/sex-in-the-city/
- futureshock 3y agoOh I do believe he thought that! He had this style of portrait he liked to do of women and their distorted faces. It seems so surreal and imaginative, but in a way, it’s not at all. Picasso painted exactly what he saw in bed with these women. Close up he saw double images of their face from two angles, a bit grotesque if you think about it, but then sex is a bit grotesque as well;) https://www.anothermag.com/art-photography/gallery/8122/picasso-the-artist-and-his-muses/0 https://www.anothermag.com/art-photography/gallery/8122/pica...
- EForEndeavour 3y agoWhere can I read more about this theory that Picasso's two-angle distorted portraits are somehow connected to what he saw during sex? Did you make this up, or is this interpretation discussed elsewhere?
- futureshock 3y agoI believe I read it on one of those little plaques describing the painting in a museum. I suppose everything was made up by someone though, including the time when Picasso made up these paintings.