5 ms·
I didn't imply ads at all - google analytics has quite extensive info about the patient, the 'user', as is. The visited sites/subsections and stuff would be qui
by xxs 3y ago
I didn't imply ads at all - google analytics has quite extensive info about the patient, the 'user', as is. The visited sites/subsections and stuff would be quite revealing.
Just using the same massive aggregator as your metrics provider is where it gets wrong.
- TheNewsIsHere 3y agoThat’s true! Our client is a small practice in pediatrics so we don’t face the same challenges as say, the Mayo Clinic would, in trying to avoid profiling based on indirect information. Most people aren’t going to be browsing the Betty Ford clinic for fun. They’re looking for something specific. That’s juicy for analytics. I’m glad I don’t have to deal with that challenge. (Conversion matching quality isn’t a fun challenge either. We’ve landed at “the practice will have to do that themselves to avoid the privacy obstacles”.)