4 ms·

Don't assess teacher quality. Eliminate poverty by eliminating capitalism, a system that literally depends on it.

CoastalCoder 2y ago
> Eliminate poverty by eliminating capitalism, a system that literally depends on it. Could you give an example of where this has worked?
- dmix 2y ago
  Why even engage this sort of thing? It's just going to turn into a flame thread.
  - CoastalCoder 2y ago
    Just in case I had something to learn. Apologies for the risk of conflagration :)
- snapplebobapple 2y ago
  If you define pverty as earning less than 15 % of the median country wage and then pay 90 % of people 2 dollars a day and 10 % of the people infinity dollars a day you have no poverty by definition. Some variation of that is how every other system of government/economy has beaten poverty. There is no point engaging these people unless you are a psychiatrist trying to help them with their mental illness.
  - philbin 2y ago
    [dead]
  - lupusreal 2y ago
    Even easier than that, simply define poverty as a property of capitalism and if anybody says that poverty also exists in your communist society, you throw them into the gulag for spreading capitalist propaganda.
driscoll42 2y ago
Even in a non-capitalist society, you still need high quality teachers and ideally some way to measure them. And it's not like eliminating capitalism in any way would prove to end poverty.
waveBidder 2y ago
if all you have is a hammer…
lupusreal 2y ago
Assessing teacher quality sounds a lot less destructive. You know, fewer people getting summarily executed for "crimes" such as owning property, being disliked by their neighbors, etc. That kind of bloodshed is what makes commies so red.
robocat 2y ago
HN guidelines: Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. Please read guidelines link at bottom of page. So many of your past comments are simple anti-capitalist opinions that are not gratifying intellectual curiosity. Not a mod: just hoping for better discourse here.

> Eliminate poverty by eliminating capitalism, a system that literally depends on it. Could you give an example of where this has worked?

dmix 2y ago
Why even engage this sort of thing? It's just going to turn into a flame thread.
- CoastalCoder 2y ago
  Just in case I had something to learn. Apologies for the risk of conflagration :)
snapplebobapple 2y ago
If you define pverty as earning less than 15 % of the median country wage and then pay 90 % of people 2 dollars a day and 10 % of the people infinity dollars a day you have no poverty by definition. Some variation of that is how every other system of government/economy has beaten poverty. There is no point engaging these people unless you are a psychiatrist trying to help them with their mental illness.
- philbin 2y ago
  [dead]
- lupusreal 2y ago
  Even easier than that, simply define poverty as a property of capitalism and if anybody says that poverty also exists in your communist society, you throw them into the gulag for spreading capitalist propaganda.

driscoll42 2y ago

Even in a non-capitalist society, you still need high quality teachers and ideally some way to measure them. And it's not like eliminating capitalism in any way would prove to end poverty.

waveBidder 2y ago

if all you have is a hammer…

lupusreal 2y ago

Assessing teacher quality sounds a lot less destructive. You know, fewer people getting summarily executed for "crimes" such as owning property, being disliked by their neighbors, etc. That kind of bloodshed is what makes commies so red.

robocat 2y ago

HN guidelines: Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. Please read guidelines link at bottom of page. So many of your past comments are simple anti-capitalist opinions that are not gratifying intellectual curiosity. Not a mod: just hoping for better discourse here.