>And the places that get left behind…? Think of it as government-performance based teaching quality variations. >But in the short term, this scheme seems like

>And the places that get left behind…? Think of it as government-performance based teaching quality variations. >But in the short term, this scheme seems likely to redistribute talent in ways that reinforce existing patterns of inequality. Only if disadvantaged districts are less likely to switch to performance-based pay. What is the basis for thinking this will happen?