3 ms·
That seems like a crazy stretch to me. Not a lawyer but the rights courts typically don’t let you sign away are things like your freedom. Signing away your ri
by alemanek 3y ago
That seems like a crazy stretch to me. Not a lawyer but the rights courts typically don’t let you sign away are things like your freedom. Signing away your right to profit or control a video you created is super common already.
Content licensing is really well established and already allows for licensing for specific use and different royalty structures based on usage. An example of this is streaming vs theater vs syndication.
So, now there is a new venue to take into account and have the lawyers add a few pages to their contracts moving forward.
- HeatrayEnjoyer 3y ago>courts typically don’t let you sign away are things like your freedom. This is exactly my point. An AI that can replace you, personally, is closer to signing away your identity or freedom than the rights to display a specific already completed work.
- spaced-out 3y agoThe court telling an artist they're not allowed to sell their videos to the highest bidder seems like a greater infringement on their freedom. What if no one wants to pay for this person's videos except for an AI company? You're basically telling them they're not allowed to profit off of their work.
- bongodongobob 3y agoYou can't just make up new definitions of freedom, that's not what freedom is.