It’s simple. You ignore fire as a bad thing and don’t even consider that as equivalent comparison to a knife. But someone who was affected by arson probably wil

It’s simple. You ignore fire as a bad thing and don’t even consider that as equivalent comparison to a knife. But someone who was affected by arson probably will say “why include fire in a blog post?!” . My point is, it is not on the author to think about all these effect when they write/speak. As a mature society, we should learn to not expect every source to filter their thoughts and rather expect the consumer to filter out what they don’t want. By not valuing fire/arson at the same level of concern as Knife(important to you), you just validated the core of the problem.