Yeah, the article also transitions from quality to bugs without explaining why quality is the lack of bugs instead of within bounds loading times, a good UI/UX,

Yeah, the article also transitions from quality to bugs without explaining why quality is the lack of bugs instead of within bounds loading times, a good UI/UX, and relevant features. Fixing bugs also seems to be limited to try catching all bugs instead of making changes to have the program do the correct thing like only loading the necessary data.