2 ms·
Nah, this would just mean that a mob can censor/cancel people they don't like, won't it? The majority doesn't care, but a small, loud minority does enough to br
by RamblingCTO 3y ago
Nah, this would just mean that a mob can censor/cancel people they don't like, won't it? The majority doesn't care, but a small, loud minority does enough to break stuff like this.
- crotchfire 3y agoWould be interesting to combine this with a web-of-trust. None of my one-hop trusted people are part of the cancelmob. If I found that somebody two hops away from me did something absurd it's quite easy to do something about it -- apply negative trust to whatever path endorsed that nonsense. Unfortunately people these days seem allergic to running anything that isn't a web browser or served by an app store, and the entities that control those two channels are extremely unexcited about decentralization.
- madacol 3y agoI've been thinking about that for years. I believe there are sooo many problems that would be solved by that kind of system And although it might not be technically practical in many cases, I think in this case it would