4 ms·
The risk of hitting the sensor and seeing it flying across the room into the TV seems too risky. As mentioned, a high FPS camera along with the Kinect tech to
by speps 2y ago
The risk of hitting the sensor and seeing it flying across the room into the TV seems too risky.
As mentioned, a high FPS camera along with the Kinect tech to extract a skeleton would work so much better. You could make that in your garage using a PlayStation Eye and existing open source tech.
- beachy 2y agoYep, the sensor would need to be buried/encased in a mat. The club needs to make contact with the mat realistically (i.e. like taking a divot on a real grass surface). Most launch monitors today use high cameras or doppler radar. Neither of them really works without a ball. The difference between a good shot and a crap shot is a few millimetres. The technology can measure a bit of data from the club alone (club speed, angle of attack) but that's not enough to accurately extrapolate actual ball flight, since it's all about the quality of the contact of club on ball before ground.