3 ms·
This link[1] takes you to the paper. From "external influences": We explore three main potential sources of positive external health effects from recessions su
by ChuckMcM 3y ago
This link[1] takes you to the paper.
From "external influences":
We explore three main potential sources of positive external health effects from recessions suggested
by prior literature: reductions in the spread of infectious disease (Adda 2016), increases in the
quality of healthcare (Stevens et al. 2015), and reductions in pollution (Chay and Greenstone 2003;
Heutel and Ruhm 2016). We find little support for a role for the first two classes of external effects,
but evidence consistent with a quantitatively important role for recession-induced reductions in air
pollution in explaining about 40 percent of the recession-induced mortality declines.
They don't cover lower driving (fewer accidents), health care tied to employment (under reported health incidents), or work place accidents (deaths due to statistical risk in higher risk jobs like construction, mining, etc.)
So no, not a particularly insightful study in my opinion.
[1] https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2024/program/paper/TEE9A8Qt https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2024/program/paper/TEE9A8Q...
- redavni 3y agoI didn't read the entire paper, but I don't see lowered stress and lack of sleep mentioned anywhere. These would be the most obvious answers and should be addressed. https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Lives-vs-Livelihoodsv2.pdf https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Lives-vs...
- passwordoops 3y agoHow dare you ruin a good headline and "think piece" with critical thinking! /s
- yen223 3y ago> By contrast, motor vehicle accidents and liver disease each account for less than 2 percent of 2006 mortality, and so their contributions to the total recession-induced mortality decline are only 6.9 percent and 2.6 percent, respectively. The paper did briefly cover accidents. Didn't check the rest.