The issue is that these people cannot judge or explain the difference between talking to 3.5 or 4. It's a mix of: 1. Prejudices against AI as an artificial ma

The issue is that these people cannot judge or explain the difference between talking to 3.5 or 4. It's a mix of: 1. Prejudices against AI as an artificial machine/math formula 2. Mistrust of corporate hype 3. Mistrust/Ignorance of benchmarks 4. Ignorance of knowledge domains where AI is useful 5. Lack of AI specific communication abilities - like asking for detailed considerations/critiques/questions, crafting substantial and accurate contexts, using tools, and correcting errors 5. Poor general communication abilities - including active listening, constructively advancing conversations, evaluating the inherent value of statements, calmly pushing back against BS, and having empathy/theory of mind for diverse communicators I think an answer could include 1. courses in debate, critical thinking, and communications 2. readings on AI specific communication strategies/theory 3. guidance for a few hundred hours of conversations with AI Imo the quality of life boost of conversing with AI is so substantial that it's worth fighting for this