2 ms·
> not that the model won't have to be good, but all of them will be good enough to solve most peoples business problems In a year or two? Mate I think you need
by mvdtnz 3y ago
> not that the model won't have to be good, but all of them will be good enough to solve most peoples business problems
In a year or two? Mate I think you need to step back from the AI hype for a moment. We're not even close.
- dudus 3y agoHaving tried all 3 (Gemini, chatgpt and Claude) I'll agree with GP that 1-2 years seems conservative if anything. I don't think AI will be won on the model but the tooling. Google is arguably ahead. The models I'd say it's a toss. But it doesn't matter as before the year is up all of them will release new versions one-uping each other. It's a race to the bottom. They either collude on price or most will go bankrupt. Edit:typo
- jstummbillig 3y agoWhen I write that tooling will be more important in the future, I am not making any crazy claims about the future of AI. My claim is: It does not require much more AI than we currently have to solve most business problems. But it will take better tooling. I don't think AGI is even remotely required to solve most peoples business problems. Better tooling is. Maybe we also have different ideas about how mundane most peoples business problems are.