4 ms·
But how do you suppose that putting people with less academic merit in those positions will create better outcomes? On one hand there is the lived experience of
by mindslight 3y ago
But how do you suppose that putting people with less academic merit in those positions will create better outcomes? On one hand there is the lived experience of being in the underclass, which might cause someone to be less supportive of tech authoritarianism from the consumer surveillance industry. On the other hand personal benefit fuck-you-got-mine is a strong attractor regardless of someone's past, and I'd think that more "privileged" people could be more independent and better at pulling in a different direction than the overall group behavior.
- yedava 3y ago> But how do you suppose that putting people with less academic merit in those positions will create better outcomes? It won't and that's the point. We should stop wasting our childhoods chasing meaningless standardized tests because the rationale for the tests is built on a lie. You can randomly pick people to run corporations and we won't be any worse off.