4 ms·
It's possible that some software did it on their behalf; I believe GPGTools submits keys to keys.openpgp.org, for example. (However, I don't know what the UI fl
by twiss 2y ago
It's possible that some software did it on their behalf; I believe GPGTools submits keys to keys.openpgp.org, for example. (However, I don't know what the UI flow looks like, it's possible that it could be made clearer what.)
Also, the WKD draft has nothing to do with what's going on here. KOO is not the same thing as WKD, and is not in beta. It's a key server, and the concept of key servers has been around for ages. (WKD has been quite widely adopted as well, despite being only a draft, but that's an orthogonal discussion. It would definitely be better if it became an RFC.)
- paulnpace 2y agoSomehow, I think either we are reading different articles or one of us has a severe reading comprehension problem. I reviewed what the author wrote and the links and read through the Proton document, and I can't figure out where I have a conceptual error, because the document states WKD, which means the published protocol must have been used or the protocol violated, which what you are describing would be out of spec from the protocol.
- bartbutler 2y agoThe author mentioned WKD but was mistaken. The culprit was keys.openpgp.org, not WKD.