3 ms·
I can hear it now "Of course not, why would an ad company sabotage itself?". Wikipedia says Chrome is set to support the header by the end of this year (2012).
by Jimmie 14y ago
I can hear it now "Of course not, why would an ad company sabotage itself?".
Wikipedia says Chrome is set to support the header by the end of this year (2012).
Wikipedia's source: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203960804577239774264364692.html http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297020396080457723...
- cooldeal 14y agoEven if what you said is true, it's definitely interesting that the browser that is on the forefront of implementation of almost every new web feature is about a year behind on only this one while all the other major browsers have already implemented it.
- Jimmie 14y agoIt is a little suspicious that Chrome is dragging it's feet, isn't it? I guess we'll see if they honour their promise by the end of the year.
- chc 14y agoIt might have to do with the fact that most Web technologies do something useful while this just sends an extra header that pretty much every site they visit will ignore. I wouldn't prioritize it either at this point in time. This is a movement that needs support from site maintainers, not browser implementors.
- cpeterso 14y agoGoogle also said they would drop H.264 support from Chrome, but we're still waiting.