3 ms·
> Citation needed. * OECD: http://fs2.american.edu/wgp/www/park_lippoldt08.pdf http://fs2.american.edu/wgp/www/park_lippoldt08.pdf * Via: https://www.forbes.c
by throw0101a 3y ago
> Citation needed.
* OECD: http://fs2.american.edu/wgp/www/park_lippoldt08.pdf http://fs2.american.edu/wgp/www/park_lippoldt08.pdf
* Via: https://www.forbes.com/sites/marshallphelps/2015/09/16/do-patents-really-promote-innovation-a-response-to-the-economist/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/marshallphelps/2015/09/16/do-pa...
A review of the literature:
* https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5664960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5664960/
- kiba 3y agoIt is a good idea to read the citation, at least in part. I am quoting from conclusion as that's the only part I am interested and read. Today, I would argue that given the limitations of the existing literature we still have essentially no credible empirical evidence on the seemingly simple question of whether stronger patent rights – either longer patent terms or broader patent rights – encourage research investments into developing new technologies. While researchers have recently begun to make progress on the more limited question of how patents on existing technologies affect follow-on innovation (Galasso and Schankerman, 2015; Sampat and Williams, 2015), evidence on the overall effects of patents on research investments are needed as one input into optimal patent policy design.