4 ms·
Looks like nowadays no one in US does really care about other countries, even US allies. 6 months ago they stopped sending limited amount of weapons to Ukraine
by ponector 3y ago
Looks like nowadays no one in US does really care about other countries, even US allies.
6 months ago they stopped sending limited amount of weapons to Ukraine.
Current foreign policy of USA clearly sends a message that other countries can do anything they want to both their citizens and their neighbors.
- ethanbond 3y agoTo be clear that’s Republicans. Democrats overwhelmingly support military aid to Ukraine. Republicans are split (at best) on the issue. Israel-Gaza is a more complicated breakdown for sure, but it’s also a much more complicated conflict.
- ponector 3y agoAren't democrats holding the office and keep not sending efficient weapons? Only bare minimum which cannot significantly affect battlefield. Morocco received few hundred US tanks recently. Do they fight for survival?
- dagw 3y agoDemocrats hold the presidency, but not the congress. If congress decides do thwart the president on an issue, then there is very little the president can do. Basically the president has the power to veto something that congress wants to do, but has virtually no power to compel congress to do something it doesn't want to do.
- ethanbond 3y agoUh no. Republicans control the House which is enough to prevent even $1 from being spent or sent anywhere. https://www.perplexity.ai/search/What-are-some-yxB.yA2.SzS7MRFtAmqgWg https://www.perplexity.ai/search/What-are-some-yxB.yA2.SzS7M... There’s not some big mystery here. Democrats are proposing bill after bill after bill, and republicans are loudly and proudly blocking them.
- ponector 3y agoIs it the House who refused to send 20+ years old heavy weapons to Ukraine since 2022?
- llamaimperative 3y agoWe did send huge amounts of aid in 2022, including 38 HIMARS, 2,000 Stingers, 100,000 anti-armor systems, 250 artillery guns, 9,000 anti-tank missiles, and 35,000 small arms. Then Republicans put a hard right Christian theocrat, who’s totally captured by the hard-right wing of the party, in charge of the House and everything has stalled.
- ponector 3y agoYes, huge amount of light weapons, short range. I've specifically mentioned heavy weapons. It is hard to fight against heavy weapons with light one, isn't it?
- ethanbond 3y agoNo, what we’re finding is actually quite the opposite. High volumes of light weapons is not only enough, but preferable on the modern battlefield even fighting against heavy weapons. What specific weapon systems would you like to see sent to Ukraine? And what bearing does this have on where blame should land for the US turning its back on Ukraine?
- influx 3y agoI wasn’t aware that outside a great movie that the USA was the world police. Russia is evil for invading Ukraine, which is a non EU, non NATO nation. Europeans should be the one fighting for freedom in Europe not the Americans.
- ponector 3y agoDidn't the US president Clinton sign the security assurances to Ukraine in exchange to their nukes? And btw, Americans are not fighting there. Sending weapons to Ukraine creates new working place in USA while weaken army of their enemy. It is obvious win-win for USA.