4 ms·
As others have mentioned, Google does client side rendering. What I was told by SEO people in my previous role (unverified otherwise) is that there's essentiall
by danpalmer 3y ago
As others have mentioned, Google does client side rendering. What I was told by SEO people in my previous role (unverified otherwise) is that there's essentially a CPU budget per site, and while you can client-side render, it takes more of that CPU budget. For a small site this may be fine, for a large site with many pages it may prevent frequent re-crawls of the site. That said, I gather the budget is not the same for all sites, but varies by other factors. As I said, unverified, but it makes sense and seems like a good way to do it.
- PlutoIsAPlanet 3y ago> while you can client-side render, it takes more of that CPU budget I wonder how Reddit gets indexed given its client-side rendering is painfully slow.
- buremba 3y agoI believe Google can override its CPU budget manually though.
- j45 3y agoI would suspect there aren't an excess of people at Google to manually override.
- h1fra 3y agoCPU Budget (and page budget) is dependent on website popularity. You can see it clearly when you start a new website, google will index 10 pages at most, and as your website grow in popularity it allows 100->1000->10K etc...
- j45 3y agoThe CPU budget, for sure, is used in google's ranking of websites because they know how long it will take a site to load, and that is a way to test the speed of a site. Server side is generally lower cpu hit for content that is more SEO specific.