3 ms·
> the British were, in their time, far better at nation building than we've been in the post-War era who does "we" refer to? The Dutch? France?
by dkdbejwi383 3y ago
> the British were, in their time, far better at nation building than we've been in the post-War era
who does "we" refer to? The Dutch? France?
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> who does "we" refer to? The Dutch? France? Sorry, clarified as America. Not aware of any Dutch nation building after WWII. (I'd argue the British also did better than the French.)
- nicolas_t 3y agoIf you read historical political discourses in France regarding the colonies, it's easy to see why the British were far better than the French. There was a lot of talk about bringing the light of civilizations to those poor colonies so, in general, they pretty much tore down the existing administrations and instead recreated their own administration from the top up. The British strategy was far more pragmatic, they kept the local powers in place and played each of them against each other to maintain control over the colonies. Of course, I'm generalizing but there's a clear difference of ideology that I do think explain the differences between the French and British when it came to managing their colonial empire.
- zaphirplane 3y agoAs in invading, killing, raping, pillaging, dividing areas into artificial countries