3 ms·
> We consider that non-local hidden variables are unlikely Doesn't that essentially mean the same as > If Bell's theorem said that there was no hidden variabl
by golergka 3y ago
> We consider that non-local hidden variables are unlikely
Doesn't that essentially mean the same as
> If Bell's theorem said that there was no hidden variables model consistent with the predictions of quantum mechanics we'd be done now.
?
- eigenket 3y agoUnlikely does not mean the same as impossible, so no. There are also some "loopholes" in the story I told above. For example the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics is completely local and deterministic, but weird enough that the standard formulation of hidden variables models doesn't apply to it.