4 ms·

So in my case, I am not using SRI. But I am using the CID as the name in the path. Using the example file from your link, I would host it as something like ht

So in my case, I am not using SRI. But I am using the CID as the name in the path. Using the example file from your link, I would host it as something like https://mywebsite.example.com/ipfs/QmPK1s3pNYLi9ERiq3BDxKa4XosgWwFRQUydHUtz4YgpqB https://mywebsite.example.com/ipfs/QmPK1s3pNYLi9ERiq3BDxKa4X... And this was enough for that particular browser I was using to recognize that this file can be attempted to be retrieved directly from IPFS

EGreg 3y ago
Yea but the gateway can be compromised, so that is insecure
- codetrotter 3y ago
  Brave wrote in 2021 that they had plans to verify the CID. Not sure if they have added that or not yet. But either way, I run Brave with a local IPFS gateway on my laptop. So I think when it said that it could retrieve those files via IPFS for me, it meant in my case that those files would be retrieved from actual IPFS and not via a public IPFS gateway hosted on the web