4 ms·
Much as I also have never understood universities teaching to "teaching" architectures (DLX), or "teaching" languages (Eiffel - luckily removed from our curricu
by don-code 2y ago
Much as I also have never understood universities teaching to "teaching" architectures (DLX), or "teaching" languages (Eiffel - luckily removed from our curriculum before I started), at the same time I did not land a job based on having learned "practical" architectures 68k or MIPS either.
- glitchc 2y agoHey I learned Eiffel. It's a nice language. I wish we had pre-conditions and post-conditions in modern procedural language.
- JohnBooty 2y agoA lot of my compsci education was in Pascal, which was not exactly a real-world language (though I guess Delphi had a dedicated niche for many years) I actually think this was probably better than learning with real-world languages? I believe it taught me to be a computer programmer. Not a Java guy or a C guy or a whatever guy. I think that was super valuable. For assembly language we learned VAX assembly, which was already hilariously outdated, but again very valuable. It had a very beginner friendly instruction set, much more friendly than x86 which would have been the other realistic choice at the time.
- DerekL 2y agoIn the 1970's and '80's, Pascal actually was commonly used for real work.