4 ms·
My biggest problem with it is it breaks operate-and-get-next (Ctrl+O). So I still have to manually walk back in my history if I want to rerun a sequence of comm
by jmholla 3y ago
My biggest problem with it is it breaks operate-and-get-next (Ctrl+O). So I still have to manually walk back in my history if I want to rerun a sequence of commands.
> operate-and-get-next (C-o)
> Accept the current line for execution and fetch the next line relative to the current line from the history for editing. A numeric argument, if supplied, specifies the history entry to use instead of the current line.