If OpenAI believes its use of copyrighted content is fair use - meaning explicitly unauthorized but permissible by the law - then it should feel confident in re

If OpenAI believes its use of copyrighted content is fair use - meaning explicitly unauthorized but permissible by the law - then it should feel confident in revealing what it is trained on. I personally believe that if the guilded creatives say they are being harmed, well, then it becomes true in all the ways that matter. It's on OpenAI to persuade them that isn't the case, and if they are persuaded, then they are no longer being harmed. Harder to say for something like, "the programmers," who have had ample opportunities to organize and have so far chosen not to. So just because many programmers use OpenAI to aid in coding, doesn't mean that there aren't some programmers being harmed. It seems legit to me that the law should provide affordances for every Tom, Dick and Harry to become a plaintiff against OpenAI, and that OpenAI can't hide behind the veil of "trade secrets" or whatever, for a fact that will come up in discovery anyway.