3 ms·
Ok so they submit a billion images now what? It's becoming increasingly clear that AI will not be found in violation of current copyright laws so unless we get
by tick_tock_tick 3y ago
Ok so they submit a billion images now what? It's becoming increasingly clear that AI will not be found in violation of current copyright laws so unless we get a major rework of them why does this matter?
- doctorpangloss 3y agoIf OpenAI believes its use of copyrighted content is fair use - meaning explicitly unauthorized but permissible by the law - then it should feel confident in revealing what it is trained on. I personally believe that if the guilded creatives say they are being harmed, well, then it becomes true in all the ways that matter. It's on OpenAI to persuade them that isn't the case, and if they are persuaded, then they are no longer being harmed. Harder to say for something like, "the programmers," who have had ample opportunities to organize and have so far chosen not to. So just because many programmers use OpenAI to aid in coding, doesn't mean that there aren't some programmers being harmed. It seems legit to me that the law should provide affordances for every Tom, Dick and Harry to become a plaintiff against OpenAI, and that OpenAI can't hide behind the veil of "trade secrets" or whatever, for a fact that will come up in discovery anyway.
- tick_tock_tick 3y ago> It's on OpenAI to persuade them that isn't the case What no they can 100% be "harmed" and have zero legal recourse nor extract any demands from OpenAI or any other AI companies. > It seems legit to me that the law should provide affordances for every Tom, Dick and Harry to become a plaintiff against OpenAI I agree and Tom, Dick, and Harry should be made to pay both sides legal fees for abusing the court system and filing frivolous lawsuits.