4 ms·
The ban was for something that had just happened, which was the poor response to emails and the inflammatory blog post. People keep trying to frame it like the
by skyyler 3y ago
The ban was for something that had just happened, which was the poor response to emails and the inflammatory blog post.
People keep trying to frame it like the ban was strictly for past actions from years ago, which I find disingenuous at worst and gullible at best.
- neonsunset 3y ago[flagged]
- jacobgkau 3y agoIMO, the rude and unprompted initial email was "inflammatory." It was responded to in kind, which the sender did not take well. If you're that upset about someone publishing a supposedly formal email that you sent, perhaps you should consider why that is instead of just knee-jerk banning the person to protect yourself.
- PlutoIsAPlanet 3y ago> which was the poor response to emails The email said it wasn't up for discussion.
- skyyler 3y agoWell gosh, why are you trying to discuss it now? Seems like a waste of time to me.