4 ms·
I have Elon hit piece exhaustion.
by slowhadoken 3y ago
I have Elon hit piece exhaustion.
- andybak 3y agoAre you talking about the original article? How is this a hit piece in any form? It doesn't even mention Musk by name.
- slowhadoken 3y ago[flagged]
- andybak 3y agoRather than being rude - read what I wrote: > "Are you talking about the original article?" You said "I have Elon hit piece exhaustion" - which sounds like you're referring to the posted article rather than the subsequent comments. Despite this - I made sure I started by asking for clarification.
- slowhadoken 3y agoMy question is fair. Your question is so naive that it appears to be asked in bad faith. If you have to ask you’ll never know. So ask with your eyes and ears. That’s my answer.
- andybak 3y agoWe're obviously talking past each other. I'll ask one more time - do you think the *article itself* is a hit piece on Elon Musk?
- slowhadoken 3y ago[flagged]
- andybak 3y agoOk. Bad faith discussion confirmed.
- slowhadoken 3y agoUh huh good job you’re a genius
- rsynnott 3y agoStock manipulation… of Twitter? That’d be a good trick.
- slowhadoken 3y agoManipulation of anything Musk owns that’s traded publicly. Keep up.
- rsynnott 3y agoOccam's razor: people are pointing out a major internet service doing something dumb and dangerous because it's a major internet service doing something dumb and dangerous, or they are doing to to... impact the price of something else the same idiot runs, somehow? How is this supposed to work? What is the incentive? What's I'm getting from this is that Tesla daytraders are now approaching GME levels of persecution complex.
- slowhadoken 3y agoYou can't say "Occam's razor" and then go off on a weird conspiracy theory lmfao How about this Occam's razor: rebranding is a thing. Get over it.