It's frustrating. Odgers' initial review [0] is clearly inadequate, for all the reasons Haidt outlines in this post: she basically says Haidt has no evidence (s

It's frustrating. Odgers' initial review [0] is clearly inadequate, for all the reasons Haidt outlines in this post: she basically says Haidt has no evidence (simply untrue) and asserts without evidence that youth mental health trends are due to socio-economic problems in the US, when Haidt has long made it clear that the problem is international. Her response either suggests that she's an overly-motivated and sloppy reader/thinker, or outright deliberately dishonest. On the other hand, Haidt's response is also inadequate, simply because he doesn't really tackle the evidence Odgers cites. [0] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00902-2 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00902-2