3 ms·
> It’s about trying hurt Dorsey’s pride. Dorsey was not part of the lawsuit and in fact rolled over his Twitter shares with the acquisition instead of taking t
by lapcat 3y ago
> It’s about trying hurt Dorsey’s pride.
Dorsey was not part of the lawsuit and in fact rolled over his Twitter shares with the acquisition instead of taking the payout, so again the "Revenge for being forced to honor his word at buying Twitter" theory makes no sense.
- jonathankoren 3y agoYou're thinking it's about money. It's not. It's about vibes.
- lapcat 3y agoI didn't say what it's about. I only said what it's not about: "Revenge for being forced to honor his word at buying Twitter". Nobody has yet made sense of that nonsensical theory.