5 ms·

I am not the one echoing on foreign forums and sites a discourse created by extremist groups to prevent criminals in Brazil to be punished by law. Nor I am imag

I am not the one echoing on foreign forums and sites a discourse created by extremist groups to prevent criminals in Brazil to be punished by law. Nor I am imagining a non existent "dictatorship" just because extremists are being persecuted by laws, laws that equally applies to any side of the political spectrum. This "brazilian dictatorship of Alexandre de Moraes" is something from the far right discourse and supported by a very narrow group of people and is not agreed outside this specific bubble.

lobocinza 3y ago
Nowadays anyone that isn't far-left is called far-right and extremist, those words are meaningless. Only the supporters of Lula are supporting this narrative that the STF is only applying the law. I don't think they realize the danger of authoritarianism. Tides inevitably change. Where you also pro judicial activism when operation Car Wash arrested hundreds of corrupts and recovered billions of taxpayer money? Or are you only in favor of judicial activism when it's used to release your political idol from jail and to persecute his political adversaries?
matheusmoreira 3y ago
I don't "echo discourses" anywhere buddy. I speak my mind. You just have no respect for the thoughts of others, do you? No respect for their freedom to think and say what they want, for their intellectual self-determination. Either they toe the party line or they're dangerous and should be persecuted. > laws that equally applies to any side of the political spectrum Prior to the election the censorship was more or less 9:1 in favor of Lula. Who also happened to be the favored candidate of the supreme court judges. Are you seriously claiming that they were treated equally? That this was a level playing field? > This "brazilian dictatorship of Alexandre de Moraes" is something from the far right discourse Looks like the rest of world isn't buying that nonsense. Whatever. Believe whatever you want. I won't call for your arrest over it. That's just barbaric.
- thiagoharry 3y ago
  > Prior to the election the censorship was more or less 9:1 in favor of Lula. Who also happened to be the favored candidate of the supreme court judges. Oh, yeah, most of them, the same judges that voted for keeping Lula jailed, forbade them of being liberated for attending to his brother's funeral... They really are Lula supporters... But oh, one side of the election 20x more disinformation against ellections and committed much more irregularities, and they suffered 9x more penalties and condemnations... Really a very serious proof of biased judges...
  - matheusmoreira 3y ago
    Uh yeah. When after the election you go to public events and brag about the fact that the court defeated Bolsonarism and that if Lula is in the presidency today it's due to the court's decisions, it becomes essentially impossible to claim that you are not biased. I remember one of them even bragged about how he's proud to be partidarian in complete defiance of common sense.

lobocinza 3y ago

Nowadays anyone that isn't far-left is called far-right and extremist, those words are meaningless. Only the supporters of Lula are supporting this narrative that the STF is only applying the law. I don't think they realize the danger of authoritarianism. Tides inevitably change. Where you also pro judicial activism when operation Car Wash arrested hundreds of corrupts and recovered billions of taxpayer money? Or are you only in favor of judicial activism when it's used to release your political idol from jail and to persecute his political adversaries?

matheusmoreira 3y ago

I don't "echo discourses" anywhere buddy. I speak my mind. You just have no respect for the thoughts of others, do you? No respect for their freedom to think and say what they want, for their intellectual self-determination. Either they toe the party line or they're dangerous and should be persecuted. > laws that equally applies to any side of the political spectrum Prior to the election the censorship was more or less 9:1 in favor of Lula. Who also happened to be the favored candidate of the supreme court judges. Are you seriously claiming that they were treated equally? That this was a level playing field? > This "brazilian dictatorship of Alexandre de Moraes" is something from the far right discourse Looks like the rest of world isn't buying that nonsense. Whatever. Believe whatever you want. I won't call for your arrest over it. That's just barbaric.

thiagoharry 3y ago
> Prior to the election the censorship was more or less 9:1 in favor of Lula. Who also happened to be the favored candidate of the supreme court judges. Oh, yeah, most of them, the same judges that voted for keeping Lula jailed, forbade them of being liberated for attending to his brother's funeral... They really are Lula supporters... But oh, one side of the election 20x more disinformation against ellections and committed much more irregularities, and they suffered 9x more penalties and condemnations... Really a very serious proof of biased judges...
- matheusmoreira 3y ago
  Uh yeah. When after the election you go to public events and brag about the fact that the court defeated Bolsonarism and that if Lula is in the presidency today it's due to the court's decisions, it becomes essentially impossible to claim that you are not biased. I remember one of them even bragged about how he's proud to be partidarian in complete defiance of common sense.