> I don't want to be a pessimist, but working with non-traditional tools is going to cost the taxpayers more money when important documents are not formatted co

> I don't want to be a pessimist, but working with non-traditional tools is going to cost the taxpayers more money when important documents are not formatted correctly or the software behaves differently than the proprietary alternatives. Comes in handy for The Dominant Vendor, who can claim that "formatted correctly" is defined as the way their software formats stuff. So I can understand Microsoft championning that definition, but why do you?