2 ms·
The folk over at Retrocomputing Stack Exchange disagree: https://retrocomputing.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1155/278 https://retrocomputing.meta.stackexchange.com/
by wizzwizz4 3y ago
The folk over at Retrocomputing Stack Exchange disagree: https://retrocomputing.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1155/278 https://retrocomputing.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1155/278
> For one, it still has about half a percent desktop share (60+% in Armenia). While this may sound small, it's still a huge number of everyday users — not to mention all the appliances, kiosks and other control systems running XP.
Per Statcounter, XP makes up 0.39% of desktop Windows machines now, which is more than Windows 8. I'm not sure what to conclude from that.
- jasomill 3y agoWindows 8.1 and 10 were free upgrades from 8 with identical system requirements and similar performance on supported hardware. Windows Vista was a paid upgrade from XP with increased system requirements and poor performance on low-end supported hardware.