"technical debt"-like stuff Again, what is this based on. Mostly on the fact that they reused existing parts to build a new service? Why is this alone somethi

"technical debt"-like stuff Again, what is this based on. Mostly on the fact that they reused existing parts to build a new service? Why is this alone something to frown upon and conclude it is achieved by being "a mess under the hood"? Maybe it is a mess, maybe it isn't. There's no reason to conclude this, other than the fact that there was reuse. Hence purism. EDIT: actually the software devs mention introducing tech-debt themselves, my bad.